OffVPSOFFSHORE VPSSupport

Decision comparison

Native service versus Docker for a first deployment

Compare process, ports, storage and update workflow.

decision comparison · Reviewed · 1 min read

Compare the same requirement

Read every row against the application you intend to operate, then test the assumption named in the example.

Scroll horizontally to read every column on a small screen.

Deployment boundary
CriterionNative systemd serviceDocker container
ProcessHost executable and unitContainer entrypoint/runtime
PortsProcess bind addressPublished host-to-container mapping
DataHost paths owned by service userNamed volume or explicit bind mount
Logsjournald or app destinationContainer logging driver/app destination
UpdatesPackage/artifact plus unit restartNew image plus container replacement
DependenciesUnit ordering/readinessCompose dependencies and health conditions

Example choice

A single binary with one config file can be simplest as a native unit. A tested image with explicit volume and loopback-only port mapping can make a multi-dependency release repeatable.

Decision

Use the boundary you can inspect and recover. Publishing a Docker port can bypass assumptions about host firewall behavior.

Documentation used

Primary references for this page. Check the documentation for the version installed in your own environment.